Following are the pleadings from each city’s lawsuit:

 

Austin 

(Plaintiffs are Consumer Service Alliance of Texas, Titlemax, and Rubicon Equity Partners)
CSAT v. Austin - Original Petition.pdf
CSAT v. Austin -  Citys Partial Plea to Jurisdiction.pdf
CSAT v. Austin - Titlemax Petition to Intervene.pdf
CSAT and Titlemax v. Austin - First Amended Answer.pdf
CSAT and Titlemax v. Austin - City Motion for Summary Judgment.pdf
Titlemax v. Austin - Original Petition.pdf
Rubicon v. City of Austin - Original Petition.pdf
Rubicon v. Austin - Original Answer.pdf
Titlemax v. Austin - Original Answer.pdf
Titlemax v. Austin - Agreed Order on Consolidation of Titlemax with Rubicon.pdf 

Dallas 

(Plaintiff is Consumer Service Alliance of Texas)
CSAT v. Dallas - Reporter's Record.pdf 
CSAT v. Dallas - Appeals Court Brief.pdf
CSAT v. Dallas - Appeals Court Response.pdf

San Antonio

(Plaintiff is Consumer Service Alliance of Texas)
CSAT v. San Antonio - Original Petition.pdf
CSAT v. San Antonio - Original Answer.pdf
Cash Station v. San Antonio - Original Petition.pdf
Cash Station v. San Antonio - Original Answer.pdf

 

El Paso

(Plaintiff is a local resident.  Note that this lawsuit was dismissed at the request of the plaintiff.)
Carl Starr v. City of El Paso - Second Amended Petition.pdf
Carl Starr v. City of El Paso - Notice of Nonsuit.pdf

Denton 

(Plaintiffs are Ace Cash Express and Consumer Service Alliance of Texas)
Babb v. Titlemax - Original Petition for Class Action.pdf (Note that this case was brought by consumers seeking a class action against Titlemax for misleading lending practices and more.)
CSAT v. Denton - Original Petition.pdf
CSAT v. Denton - Original Answer and Counterclaim.pdf
CSAT v. Denton - Notice of Nonsuit.pdf
Ace Cash Express v. Denton - Original Petition.pdf

 

 

 

Updates

Example Ordinance

Helpful Links